Monday, May 27, 2019

In Remembrance



For my Grandma, it was always Decoration Day. That last Monday in May. And for her, it was the day for remembering all our dead.

That meant tramping out to possibly overgrown cemeteries with pots of geraniums that we would plant on the graves. There was Grandpa’s grave, of course. And her sisters'. In fact, the whole work of Decoration Day involved going to several cemeteries and crossing state lines. No doubt we took a picnic lunch to eat along the way. Whatever the weather, rain or shine, the graves must be decorated.

We were remembering our dead.

Then, in school, I learned about Memorial Day, which was actually the same thing. And then I began noticing the military-style ceremonies that took place in my small town around the flagpole at the local cemetery, complete with taps and a gun salute. Sometimes my preacher father was even asked to come say a prayer.

That's when I realized that Decoration Day had become Memorial Day, and it was not just about honoring the dead—it was about the soldiers who had died in combat. Our family hadn’t focused on that because we had roots in traditional peace churches—Quaker and Mennonite. It was no surprise that I would end up a pacifist. 

I was distraught in 1969 when my brother enlisted in the Army. I had wanted him to hike north to Canada and declare his conscientious objection to war.  Instead, he enlisted in order to avoid the Vietnam draft lottery. He was comfortably ensconced in a bunker on the DMZ between North and South Korea, listening to North Korean broadcasts (and partying  for four days after every four-day shift in the bunker). 

So on Memorial Day, our family had no hero to mourn. No lost son to remember. We only had dead relatives’ graves to decorate on “Decoration Day.”

From my late teens on, I’ve had a problem celebrating Memorial Day. I understand now that the first remembrance, which was called Decoration Day, came in 1868 and was to honor soldiers who lost their lives “in defense of their country during the late rebellion.”

I learned in school that it became known as Memorial Day and included remembering soldiers who had lost their lives in other wars, from World War I on.

But I had a hard time. On the one hand, I could imagine the grief of losing a brother, a husband, a lover, a father, in a war. But on the other hand, I was conflicted about the whole idea of war and the veneration of it, especially because in my lifetime, it seemed like all the wars have pretty much been about oil, and making sure we had access to it at a good price.  

It didn’t seem like our wars were about preserving our freedom--for us or for anyone else--although that is how these wars were framed. So the people who served their country allegedly to make sure we were free may ultimately have been mostly ensuring a cheap gallon of gas at the pump. I know this is a rather cynical assertion, and I understand that vets may take exception to this. (I welcome comments on this post.) So what I really want to do is to propose that we expand our idea of Memorial Day.

While remembering and honoring soldiers who lost their lives in service to our country, let’s also remember activists who have lost their lives in the service of the greater good. In service to humanity. In service to their brothers and sisters.

Let’s remember people like Emma Goldman (buried a mile away from where I live). Martin Luther King, Jr., Harvey Milk, Rev. Bruce Klunder. Let’s even go beyond our borders and honor folks like Mahatma Gandhi. Chico Mendes and Dorothy Stang. Marielle Franco.

There are so many names. Who would you say we should be remembering this Memorial Day/ What “soldiers” for human rights and environmental rights should we also honor today?

 
 This is an opinion piece and represents the opinion of the author, Etta Worthington




Sunday, May 19, 2019

Support the Voting in Jail bill




 
Photo courtesy of Chicago Votes

Interactions with the criminal justice system are preventing tens of thousands of Illinois citizens from voting. This includes the 20,000 currently detained in Illinois jails awaiting their trials. These people have not yet been convicted of a crime and are eligible to vote. But there is no mechanism for them to do so. It also includes the 30,000 released each year from prison, who are eligible to vote but may not because they think their past criminal conviction denies them that right. An estimated four million people in Illinois have a past criminal conviction. Many don't realize that they have the right to vote, don't know how to exercise that right, or lack information about how voting would benefit them and their communities.

That’s why we should all push for passage of SB2090, the voting in jail bill. This bill requires county jails and election authorities to create a process to ensure that people awaiting trial (who have not been convicted) can cast their ballots during elections. It also requires the Illinois Department of Corrections to provide a voter registration application and information on voting rights to all eligible citizens who have released from their custody.

This bill was drafted by Chicago Votes, the Illinois Justice Project, the Sargent Shriver Center on Poverty Law and the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois. It passed in the Illinois Senate and is currently in the Illinois House. This is a good time to contact your house representative and Governor Pritzker’s office and urge that SB2090 be approved by the house and signed into law.

Here’s a sample script:

My name is ______ and I am a voter from _____. I’m calling to urge you to support the full bill of SB2090, the voting in jail bill, because people not convicted of a crime and those who’ve served their time are legally entitled to vote, but they don't have access if they are in jail awaiting trial, and they often don't know their rights after they are released from prison. Democracy works best when all eligible citizens can vote, so please support SB2090. Thank you.


Click here to locate your Illinois Representative and get their phone number.

Call Governor Pritzker's office at 217.781.0244

(Note: Governor Rauner vetoed HB4469, so this is round two for SB2090.) 

There's also a bill in the Illinois House to encourage voting among those released from prison. HB2541 The Re-Entering Citizens Civic Education Act would provide re-entering citizens with non-partisan peer education about the voting process, government and current affairs within one year of their scheduled release.

This bill, sponsored by Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, Just Democracy and Chicago Votes, has dozens of legislative co-sponsors and supporting organizations. Please call to support it, too. Here's a sample script:

My name is ________ and I am a voter from _______. I;'m calling to urge you to vote for HB2541, the Re-entering Citizens Civics Education Act. People who are given civics education before release from prison are more likely to integrate successfully into society, and less likely to return to prison. Also, they have the right to vote, but lack information about that right and how to vote. So please support HB2541. Thank you.

Friday, May 17, 2019

Coal is So Yesterday!

A Toxic Threat to Water Quality and Human Health
We Need to Act Now


The Coal Ash bill SB9 passed out of the Senate on May 15. Now the bill is on to the House. It will be heard in Committee on Thursday. We’re hopeful it passes out of committee, and then onto the full house for a vote.

Coal ash is a waste byproduct of burning coal, and contains toxic metals that cause serious health problems, including cancer. Illinois has at least 80 coal ash impoundments at dozens of power plant sites - more than any other state! In 2018, water at 22 of 24 coal ash sites tested in Illinois had unsafe concentrations of dangerous coal ash pollutants.


"Stacks" by jlgriffiths is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0  


The best way to ensure that industry—not taxpayers—completes closure and clean up of coal ash sites properly and promptly is to require financial assurance. That means industry must set aside funds in amounts needed to ensure proper cleanup and closure at these polluting sites. Doing so provides companies an incentive to complete the work required to get back the bonds or other funds they have posted.

SB 9 does not allow financial assurances like self-bonding and collateral bonds that would have
little or no value in a bankruptcy proceeding. Many states, including Kentucky, Virginia, Maine, Oregon, and Colorado ban this practice. A USEPA rule gives Illinois power companies until October 31, 2020 to close coal ash disposal areas that fail groundwater protection requirements. The companies have known for years that they will have to pay for closure of their unlined, leaking, coal ash impoundments. Upwards of 50 impoundments must close in Illinois.


What SB 9 Does for Illinois
Senate Bill 9 was drafted in partnership with IEPA and provides Illinois communities the protection they need from toxic coal ash pollution as impoundments are closed.

• Provides a regulatory framework for EPA to approve protective closure plans for coal ash impoundments.
• Requires Financial Assurance to ensure Illinois taxpayers are not stuck with the bill for cleanup.
• Ensures meaningful public participation and transparency for affected communities.
• Focuses on environmental justice communities and high risk impoundments.
• Assesses fees on polluters to provide IEPA the resources they need.


Financial Assurance Protect Illinois Taxpayers
The best way to ensure that industry—not taxpayers—completes closure and clean up of coal ash sites properly and promptly is to require financial assurance. That means industry must set aside funds in amounts needed to ensure proper cleanup and closure at these polluting sites. Doing so provides companies an incentive to complete the work required to get back the bonds or other funds they have posted. SB 9 does not allow financial assurances like self-bondingand collateral bonds that would have little or no value in a bankruptcy proceeding. Many states, including Kentucky, Virginia, Maine, Oregon, and Colorado ban this practice.

So what can you do?  Whatever can you do? Glad you asked!

You can call your state rep. Wait a minute.  Are you still unsure who they are or what their phone number is? No problem. You can look that up here

Say you’re a voter in the district, and tell the person who answers the phone that you want your Representative to vote YES on SB9 to protect Illinois communities from toxic coal ash pollution.  

Note:The above information was provided to us by the Clean Power Team from the Illinois Sierra Club.